銓敍部:考績法訂定丙等 並無違憲之虞 - 考績

By Megan
at 2010-10-05T21:45
at 2010-10-05T21:45
Table of Contents
※ 引述《bvc123 (幸福是什麼)》之銘言:
: 報載考績法修正草案訂定丙等相關規定有違憲之虞一事,銓敘部表示:司法院釋字
: 第243、298、491、583等號解釋,均肯認懲戒及懲處併存之雙軌制,是考績法規範具懲戒
: 性質之處分,尚非憲法所不許。又考績考列丙等之11款要件及有關規定,俱於考績法明
: 定,法意甚明,並非難以理解,符合法律保留原則及明確性,亦無違司法院釋字第483
: 號、第491號解釋意旨。
-----
人家明明是在說你那條強制三趴考丙的規定不符合法律明確性,
你卻在鬼扯說你另外一條明定考績丙等條件的條文符合明確性,
你是看不懂中國字,還是故意「呷人夠夠?」
如果你是要「官逼民反」,製造恐懼,激怒我們這些被你迫害的人,
那我承認你做得真的很成功,直可比美納粹德國!
納粹德國在屠殺天生有殘疾的兒童的時候,
所持的理由也是「優生學」、「這樣子對國家大多數人民有利」,
多麼冠冕堂皇,多麼像你現在提的「強制淘汰考績最後三趴的人」!
當今皇上應該給你個特優,直升為繼任中華帝國元首人選,
這條滿清宮廷路,你們兩位老人家走得真的很有聲有色!
我等著看你們2012還要再拿什麼來講?
是「公務人員,你們的老朋友,小馬哥又來了!」嗎?
ps.順帶一提,馬關兩位老人家那條「乙等停跳年功俸」可是完全沒有違憲的疑慮!
就算你逃得了丙等,卻絕對逃不了這一條,還心存幻想的人就醒醒吧!
--
: 報載考績法修正草案訂定丙等相關規定有違憲之虞一事,銓敘部表示:司法院釋字
: 第243、298、491、583等號解釋,均肯認懲戒及懲處併存之雙軌制,是考績法規範具懲戒
: 性質之處分,尚非憲法所不許。又考績考列丙等之11款要件及有關規定,俱於考績法明
: 定,法意甚明,並非難以理解,符合法律保留原則及明確性,亦無違司法院釋字第483
: 號、第491號解釋意旨。
-----
人家明明是在說你那條強制三趴考丙的規定不符合法律明確性,
你卻在鬼扯說你另外一條明定考績丙等條件的條文符合明確性,
你是看不懂中國字,還是故意「呷人夠夠?」
如果你是要「官逼民反」,製造恐懼,激怒我們這些被你迫害的人,
那我承認你做得真的很成功,直可比美納粹德國!
納粹德國在屠殺天生有殘疾的兒童的時候,
所持的理由也是「優生學」、「這樣子對國家大多數人民有利」,
多麼冠冕堂皇,多麼像你現在提的「強制淘汰考績最後三趴的人」!
當今皇上應該給你個特優,直升為繼任中華帝國元首人選,
這條滿清宮廷路,你們兩位老人家走得真的很有聲有色!
我等著看你們2012還要再拿什麼來講?
是「公務人員,你們的老朋友,小馬哥又來了!」嗎?
ps.順帶一提,馬關兩位老人家那條「乙等停跳年功俸」可是完全沒有違憲的疑慮!
就算你逃得了丙等,卻絕對逃不了這一條,還心存幻想的人就醒醒吧!
--
Tags:
考績
All Comments

By Ingrid
at 2010-10-06T05:11
at 2010-10-06T05:11

By Frederic
at 2010-10-06T13:11
at 2010-10-06T13:11

By Tristan Cohan
at 2010-10-08T17:43
at 2010-10-08T17:43

By Megan
at 2010-10-09T03:02
at 2010-10-09T03:02

By Olga
at 2010-10-11T02:15
at 2010-10-11T02:15

By Una
at 2010-10-14T19:09
at 2010-10-14T19:09

By Candice
at 2010-10-15T09:53
at 2010-10-15T09:53

By Daph Bay
at 2010-10-18T01:23
at 2010-10-18T01:23

By Kelly
at 2010-10-22T06:52
at 2010-10-22T06:52

By Joe
at 2010-10-25T17:30
at 2010-10-25T17:30

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2010-10-27T21:49
at 2010-10-27T21:49

By Isabella
at 2010-10-31T08:10
at 2010-10-31T08:10

By Catherine
at 2010-11-03T00:12
at 2010-11-03T00:12

By Vanessa
at 2010-11-06T16:26
at 2010-11-06T16:26

By Robert
at 2010-11-11T10:42
at 2010-11-11T10:42

By Adele
at 2010-11-15T14:39
at 2010-11-15T14:39

By Jacob
at 2010-11-16T17:37
at 2010-11-16T17:37

By Odelette
at 2010-11-21T09:35
at 2010-11-21T09:35

By Mia
at 2010-11-23T18:46
at 2010-11-23T18:46

By Brianna
at 2010-11-26T02:01
at 2010-11-26T02:01

By Rachel
at 2010-11-29T13:29
at 2010-11-29T13:29

By Gary
at 2010-12-01T14:39
at 2010-12-01T14:39

By Quanna
at 2010-12-05T12:06
at 2010-12-05T12:06

By Olive
at 2010-12-08T03:47
at 2010-12-08T03:47

By Sierra Rose
at 2010-12-09T13:22
at 2010-12-09T13:22

By Cara
at 2010-12-12T12:21
at 2010-12-12T12:21

By Susan
at 2010-12-15T02:56
at 2010-12-15T02:56

By Faithe
at 2010-12-16T01:56
at 2010-12-16T01:56

By Enid
at 2010-12-19T01:29
at 2010-12-19T01:29

By Elvira
at 2010-12-20T23:59
at 2010-12-20T23:59

By Genevieve
at 2010-12-21T20:25
at 2010-12-21T20:25

By Cara
at 2010-12-22T20:14
at 2010-12-22T20:14

By Zenobia
at 2010-12-26T19:41
at 2010-12-26T19:41

By Daniel
at 2010-12-27T20:30
at 2010-12-27T20:30

By Joe
at 2010-12-29T08:03
at 2010-12-29T08:03

By Poppy
at 2010-12-31T08:56
at 2010-12-31T08:56

By Ula
at 2011-01-05T06:20
at 2011-01-05T06:20

By Oscar
at 2011-01-06T05:36
at 2011-01-06T05:36

By Edwina
at 2011-01-09T07:24
at 2011-01-09T07:24

By Annie
at 2011-01-14T05:54
at 2011-01-14T05:54

By Ula
at 2011-01-15T13:18
at 2011-01-15T13:18

By Edward Lewis
at 2011-01-15T23:39
at 2011-01-15T23:39

By Bethany
at 2011-01-18T17:35
at 2011-01-18T17:35

By Kristin
at 2011-01-20T06:22
at 2011-01-20T06:22

By Lydia
at 2011-01-20T10:50
at 2011-01-20T10:50
Related Posts
銓敍部:考績法訂定丙等 並無違憲之虞

By William
at 2010-10-05T20:39
at 2010-10-05T20:39
資歷最菜吞丙 公務員看精神科

By Caroline
at 2010-10-05T19:54
at 2010-10-05T19:54
關於新制考績法修訂 會不會只是煙霧彈?

By Xanthe
at 2010-10-05T19:30
at 2010-10-05T19:30
考訓會:沒吃丙者看精神科

By Anthony
at 2010-10-05T17:15
at 2010-10-05T17:15
公務員3%考丙 立院報告:違法違憲

By Delia
at 2010-10-05T12:06
at 2010-10-05T12:06